https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780267 HC quashed two impugned orders dated 08.07.2025 and 30.07.2025 for lack of effective hearing and non-compliance with CBDT guidance, and remanded the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration. The respondent was directed to reconsider the petitioner's stay application dated 07.07.2025 and decide it on merits within two weeks of the web upload of this order. The HC also quashed the subsequent notice dated 08.09.2025 and ordered immediate lifting of the attachment on the petitioner's bank account, restraining further coercive recovery steps pending fresh disposal. en-us Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:17:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780267 HC quashed two impugned orders dated 08.07.2025 and 30.07.2025 for lack of effective hearing and non-compliance with CBDT guidance, and remanded the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration. The respondent was directed to reconsider the petitioner's stay application dated 07.07.2025 and decide it on merits within two weeks of the web upload of this order. The HC also quashed the subsequent notice dated 08.09.2025 and ordered immediate lifting of the attachment on the petitioner's bank account, restraining further coercive recovery steps pending fresh disposal. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780267