https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47506 The court upheld the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision to restrain the petitioner from alienating or transferring imported machinery, attaching it in favor of the Assistant Collector of Customs & Excise. The petitioner was made responsible for the machinery's upkeep and maintenance, located in Village Surajpur, Noida. The machinery could be disposed of based on the appeal outcome or Appellate Authority's direction. The court modified the Tribunal's order accordingly, disposing of the writ petition and leaving parties to bear their own costs. en-us Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:51:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47506 The court upheld the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision to restrain the petitioner from alienating or transferring imported machinery, attaching it in favor of the Assistant Collector of Customs & Excise. The petitioner was made responsible for the machinery's upkeep and maintenance, located in Village Surajpur, Noida. The machinery could be disposed of based on the appeal outcome or Appellate Authority's direction. The court modified the Tribunal's order accordingly, disposing of the writ petition and leaving parties to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47506