<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 1428 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464361</link>
    <description>The Karnataka HC noted that the constitutional validity of provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 had already been upheld by the Supreme Court in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary. On that basis, the writ petition challenging those provisions was held not to survive for consideration and was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 17:35:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 1428 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464361</link>
      <description>The Karnataka HC noted that the constitutional validity of provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 had already been upheld by the Supreme Court in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary. On that basis, the writ petition challenging those provisions was held not to survive for consideration and was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>