<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1500 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464362</link>
    <description>NCLAT held that the AA wrongly rejected a Section 7 application by misreading the bank statement and without issuing notice, concluding there was insufficient basis for dismissal. The order dated 28.07.2022 was set aside and the company petition revived. The matter is remitted to the AA to be heard and decided afresh in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 17:35:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1500 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464362</link>
      <description>NCLAT held that the AA wrongly rejected a Section 7 application by misreading the bank statement and without issuing notice, concluding there was insufficient basis for dismissal. The order dated 28.07.2022 was set aside and the company petition revived. The matter is remitted to the AA to be heard and decided afresh in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>