<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1624 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464364</link>
    <description>CBIC litigation policy bars departmental appeals before CESTAT where the duty amount is below the prescribed monetary threshold. Appeals already filed below that threshold must be withdrawn, so the Revenue appeal was dismissed without examination of the merits. The dismissal rests solely on maintainability under the monetary-limit policy and does not determine the underlying duty dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 17:35:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1624 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464364</link>
      <description>CBIC litigation policy bars departmental appeals before CESTAT where the duty amount is below the prescribed monetary threshold. Appeals already filed below that threshold must be withdrawn, so the Revenue appeal was dismissed without examination of the merits. The dismissal rests solely on maintainability under the monetary-limit policy and does not determine the underlying duty dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>