<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1914 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464366</link>
    <description>CBIC litigation policy barred filing of the Revenue&#039;s appeal where the duty involved was below the prescribed monetary threshold, and required withdrawal of appeals already filed. Applying that circular-based threshold, CESTAT Chandigarh declined to examine the customs dispute on merits and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal as not entertainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 17:35:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1914 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464366</link>
      <description>CBIC litigation policy barred filing of the Revenue&#039;s appeal where the duty involved was below the prescribed monetary threshold, and required withdrawal of appeals already filed. Applying that circular-based threshold, CESTAT Chandigarh declined to examine the customs dispute on merits and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal as not entertainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>