https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47501 Civil court jurisdiction was impliedly barred where the central excise statute created a complete adjudicatory and appellate machinery, including assessment, appeal and further statutory recourse. The court held that such a scheme excluded civil suit intervention by necessary implication, so the suit and injunction petition could not be entertained to challenge excise orders. The impugned order refusing injunction was therefore upheld, and the objection to civil court jurisdiction failed because the statute supplied an exclusive remedy. en-us Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:39:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47501 Civil court jurisdiction was impliedly barred where the central excise statute created a complete adjudicatory and appellate machinery, including assessment, appeal and further statutory recourse. The court held that such a scheme excluded civil suit intervention by necessary implication, so the suit and injunction petition could not be entertained to challenge excise orders. The impugned order refusing injunction was therefore upheld, and the objection to civil court jurisdiction failed because the statute supplied an exclusive remedy. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47501