https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93559 CESTAT held that seized areca (betel) nuts were neither prohibited nor notified under the Customs Act, therefore the Revenue bore the evidentiary burden to prove smuggling. The Tribunal found the Revenue failed to discharge that onus; statements relied upon were insufficient to establish illegal importation from Myanmar and Indonesia or contraband status. Consequentially, the monetary penalties levied against the appellants for alleged illegal procurement and importation were found unsustainable and were set aside. The impugned penalty orders are quashed and the appeal is allowed to the extent of striking down the penalties; no further sanction may be imposed on the appellants based on the present record. en-us Sat, 25 Oct 2025 09:37:59 +0530 Sat, 25 Oct 2025 09:37:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93559 CESTAT held that seized areca (betel) nuts were neither prohibited nor notified under the Customs Act, therefore the Revenue bore the evidentiary burden to prove smuggling. The Tribunal found the Revenue failed to discharge that onus; statements relied upon were insufficient to establish illegal importation from Myanmar and Indonesia or contraband status. Consequentially, the monetary penalties levied against the appellants for alleged illegal procurement and importation were found unsustainable and were set aside. The impugned penalty orders are quashed and the appeal is allowed to the extent of striking down the penalties; no further sanction may be imposed on the appellants based on the present record. Highlights Customs Sat, 25 Oct 2025 09:37:59 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93559