<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 7 admission upheld: Rs.1,00,00,000 recorded as financial debt under Section 5(8); consultancy advance unproven</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93526</link>
    <description>NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s admission of the Section 7 application, dismissing the appeal. The Tribunal found that the respondent&#039;s disbursal of Rs.1,00,00,000 on 20.11.2010, consistently recorded in the corporate debtor&#039;s balance sheets as &quot;other long-term liabilities,&quot; establishes a financial debt within the meaning of Section 5(8) IBC; the time value of money requirement is satisfied. The appellant&#039;s retrospective assertion of a consultancy advance, supported only by a pro forma invoice dated nearly two years after disbursement and a belated claim before the liquidator, was held to be unsubstantiated and inherently improbable. Debt and default were found proved; no interference with the admission order was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 09:00:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 09:00:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 7 admission upheld: Rs.1,00,00,000 recorded as financial debt under Section 5(8); consultancy advance unproven</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93526</link>
      <description>NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s admission of the Section 7 application, dismissing the appeal. The Tribunal found that the respondent&#039;s disbursal of Rs.1,00,00,000 on 20.11.2010, consistently recorded in the corporate debtor&#039;s balance sheets as &quot;other long-term liabilities,&quot; establishes a financial debt within the meaning of Section 5(8) IBC; the time value of money requirement is satisfied. The appellant&#039;s retrospective assertion of a consultancy advance, supported only by a pro forma invoice dated nearly two years after disbursement and a belated claim before the liquidator, was held to be unsubstantiated and inherently improbable. Debt and default were found proved; no interference with the admission order was warranted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 09:00:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>