https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780175 Money-laundering was treated as an independent and continuing offence, so liability could arise where proceeds of crime were dealt with as untainted property after the statutory framework covered the conduct; the objection based on the predicate offences not being scheduled at the time was rejected. Provisional attachment was held to extend to property held by persons not named as accused in the scheduled offence or complaint, if the property represented proceeds of crime and was connected with concealment, possession, use, acquisition, or projection of such proceeds. The first appellant also failed to prove a lawful source for the purchase and later intra-family transfer, so the attachment was sustained. en-us Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Oct 2025 09:00:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780175 Money-laundering was treated as an independent and continuing offence, so liability could arise where proceeds of crime were dealt with as untainted property after the statutory framework covered the conduct; the objection based on the predicate offences not being scheduled at the time was rejected. Provisional attachment was held to extend to property held by persons not named as accused in the scheduled offence or complaint, if the property represented proceeds of crime and was connected with concealment, possession, use, acquisition, or projection of such proceeds. The first appellant also failed to prove a lawful source for the purchase and later intra-family transfer, so the attachment was sustained. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780175