https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47490 The Court dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Appellant's incorrect affidavits, delayed filing, false averments, and lack of promptitude were criticized. The Court imposed costs on the Appellant for misleading the Court with a false affidavit, directing payment to the Respondent and Delhi Legal Services Authority within one month. Vigilance in legal matters and protection of litigant interests against casual approaches were emphasized, with the option to recover costs from responsible officer(s) for the delay. en-us Thu, 05 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:03:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47490 The Court dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Appellant's incorrect affidavits, delayed filing, false averments, and lack of promptitude were criticized. The Court imposed costs on the Appellant for misleading the Court with a false affidavit, directing payment to the Respondent and Delhi Legal Services Authority within one month. Vigilance in legal matters and protection of litigant interests against casual approaches were emphasized, with the option to recover costs from responsible officer(s) for the delay. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 05 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47490