<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1007 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780211</link>
    <description>ITAT KOLKATA - AT held that a notice issued under s.148 by an ACIT was invalid where the assessee had filed return and jurisdiction to issue the notice lay with the ITO per CBDT Instruction No.1/2011. Relying on a HC precedent, the Tribunal quashed the assessment framed by the AO for lack of jurisdiction and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 09:00:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=860063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1007 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780211</link>
      <description>ITAT KOLKATA - AT held that a notice issued under s.148 by an ACIT was invalid where the assessee had filed return and jurisdiction to issue the notice lay with the ITO per CBDT Instruction No.1/2011. Relying on a HC precedent, the Tribunal quashed the assessment framed by the AO for lack of jurisdiction and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>