https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780215 ITAT held that cancellation of registration under section 12A by the PCIT, Central, Kanpur was without jurisdiction and quashed the cancellation. Relying on parallel bench decisions and noting CBDT notification of 22.10.2014 designates CIT(E) as the competent authority to grant or cancel section 12A registration, the tribunal found PCIT lacked authority. The assessee's appeal was allowed and the order cancelling registration set aside. en-us Fri, 17 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 May 2026 16:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780215 ITAT held that cancellation of registration under section 12A by the PCIT, Central, Kanpur was without jurisdiction and quashed the cancellation. Relying on parallel bench decisions and noting CBDT notification of 22.10.2014 designates CIT(E) as the competent authority to grant or cancel section 12A registration, the tribunal found PCIT lacked authority. The assessee's appeal was allowed and the order cancelling registration set aside. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 17 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780215