https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780232 The Madras HC exercised writ jurisdiction to grant conditional relief against a GST adjudication order where the taxpayer had not replied to the show cause notice or attended hearings and the appeal period had expired. It set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication, directing the taxpayer to deposit 50% of the disputed tax in cash within thirty days, file a reply with supporting documents, and treat the impugned order as an addendum to the show cause notice. Amounts already recovered could be adjusted toward the required deposit, subject to verification. en-us Wed, 22 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Oct 2025 09:00:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780232 The Madras HC exercised writ jurisdiction to grant conditional relief against a GST adjudication order where the taxpayer had not replied to the show cause notice or attended hearings and the appeal period had expired. It set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication, directing the taxpayer to deposit 50% of the disputed tax in cash within thirty days, file a reply with supporting documents, and treat the impugned order as an addendum to the show cause notice. Amounts already recovered could be adjusted toward the required deposit, subject to verification. Case-Laws GST Wed, 22 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780232