https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464348 In an appeal against a temporary injunction, the SC held that the appellate court may interfere only if the trial court's discretion was arbitrary, capricious, perverse, or contrary to settled principles, and it cannot substitute its own view merely because another view is possible; the High Court's wider reappraisal was therefore impermissible. The Court also held that where the suit concerned joint property allegedly transferred during litigation and the relief sought included cancellation of the sale deed, restraint against further alienation was justified to preserve the subject matter pending trial, and the injunction was restored notwithstanding pendente lite transfer principles. en-us Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Oct 2025 12:11:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464348 In an appeal against a temporary injunction, the SC held that the appellate court may interfere only if the trial court's discretion was arbitrary, capricious, perverse, or contrary to settled principles, and it cannot substitute its own view merely because another view is possible; the High Court's wider reappraisal was therefore impermissible. The Court also held that where the suit concerned joint property allegedly transferred during litigation and the relief sought included cancellation of the sale deed, restraint against further alienation was justified to preserve the subject matter pending trial, and the injunction was restored notwithstanding pendente lite transfer principles. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464348