https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464349 The HC held the petitioners are alleged to have committed a scheduled offence under PMLA and that staying proceedings on grounds of procedural irregularity would defeat the statute's object. The court refused to grant a blanket stay but directed the main petition to be listed on 31.05.2016 along with another writ petition. In the interim the HC ordered that any order passed by the Adjudicating Authority under Section 8(3) of the PMLA against the petitioners shall not be given effect to. Petition disposed. en-us Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Oct 2025 19:10:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464349 The HC held the petitioners are alleged to have committed a scheduled offence under PMLA and that staying proceedings on grounds of procedural irregularity would defeat the statute's object. The court refused to grant a blanket stay but directed the main petition to be listed on 31.05.2016 along with another writ petition. In the interim the HC ordered that any order passed by the Adjudicating Authority under Section 8(3) of the PMLA against the petitioners shall not be given effect to. Petition disposed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464349