https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47480 The High Court clarified that in a case involving an application for stay related to a reference under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the Court's jurisdiction is advisory, not determinative of the appeal. It was held that the High Court cannot grant a stay in such cases, dismissing the application but allowing the appellant to seek further remedies elsewhere. The application was treated as an informal paper book, expediting the appeal hearing process for a swift resolution. en-us Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:25:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47480 The High Court clarified that in a case involving an application for stay related to a reference under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the Court's jurisdiction is advisory, not determinative of the appeal. It was held that the High Court cannot grant a stay in such cases, dismissing the application but allowing the appellant to seek further remedies elsewhere. The application was treated as an informal paper book, expediting the appeal hearing process for a swift resolution. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47480