<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 745 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464346</link>
    <description>SC granted leave, set aside the impugned orders and remitted the matter to the Uttarakhand HC for fresh adjudication on whether the non-resident assessee could claim deductions for expenses incurred during 1993-1999 when, according to the revenue, no P.E. existed in India. The Court held that the HC had to decide that legal question afresh. The appeals were allowed and disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 16:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 745 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464346</link>
      <description>SC granted leave, set aside the impugned orders and remitted the matter to the Uttarakhand HC for fresh adjudication on whether the non-resident assessee could claim deductions for expenses incurred during 1993-1999 when, according to the revenue, no P.E. existed in India. The Court held that the HC had to decide that legal question afresh. The appeals were allowed and disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>