<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 85 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47476</link>
    <description>The petition under Article 227 regarding central excise duty on prepared culture media was disposed of as not pressed. The court directed the continuation of bank guarantees for six months and instructed respondent-authorities to promptly decide the matter within four months. The petitioners were allowed to present defenses before the authorities, emphasizing the importance of expeditious decision-making while maintaining the status quo on bank guarantees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:12:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 85 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47476</link>
      <description>The petition under Article 227 regarding central excise duty on prepared culture media was disposed of as not pressed. The court directed the continuation of bank guarantees for six months and instructed respondent-authorities to promptly decide the matter within four months. The petitioners were allowed to present defenses before the authorities, emphasizing the importance of expeditious decision-making while maintaining the status quo on bank guarantees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>