https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464345 In second appeal, the High Court may determine an issue of fact under Section 103 CPC where the lower appellate court has misdirected itself on the legal effect of the evidence, and such intervention remains within the limits of second appellate jurisdiction. The eviction grounds under clauses (m) and (o) of Section 12(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act are distinct and their ingredients cannot be interchanged; clause (o) applies to unauthorised occupation outside the tenancy and failure to vacate after notice. On the facts found, the tenant's failure to vacate the disputed portion and comply with the decree sustained eviction and the related consequence under Section 13. en-us Mon, 03 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Oct 2025 14:15:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464345 In second appeal, the High Court may determine an issue of fact under Section 103 CPC where the lower appellate court has misdirected itself on the legal effect of the evidence, and such intervention remains within the limits of second appellate jurisdiction. The eviction grounds under clauses (m) and (o) of Section 12(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act are distinct and their ingredients cannot be interchanged; clause (o) applies to unauthorised occupation outside the tenancy and failure to vacate after notice. On the facts found, the tenant's failure to vacate the disputed portion and comply with the decree sustained eviction and the related consequence under Section 13. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464345