https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464341 In second appeal, the scope of interference is confined to substantial questions of law, and factual findings may be disturbed only in recognised exceptional cases such as no evidence, inadmissible evidence, ignored material evidence, or misapplication of settled principles. The High Court's fresh reappreciation of evidence and factual inquiry exceeded that limit. On title, property allotted after partition is treated as separate property unless a proved joint family nucleus funds the purchase or there is clear blending into common stock. As no reliable nucleus or blending was proved, the property was treated as self-acquired, and the sale by Defendant No.1 to Defendant No.2 was valid. en-us Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Oct 2025 12:05:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464341 In second appeal, the scope of interference is confined to substantial questions of law, and factual findings may be disturbed only in recognised exceptional cases such as no evidence, inadmissible evidence, ignored material evidence, or misapplication of settled principles. The High Court's fresh reappreciation of evidence and factual inquiry exceeded that limit. On title, property allotted after partition is treated as separate property unless a proved joint family nucleus funds the purchase or there is clear blending into common stock. As no reliable nucleus or blending was proved, the property was treated as self-acquired, and the sale by Defendant No.1 to Defendant No.2 was valid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464341