<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 107 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47473</link>
    <description>An appellate order passed without affording the affected parties a reasonable opportunity of hearing cannot be sustained, as it suffers from procedural infirmity and violates fairness in adjudication. The Gujarat High Court held that the Tribunal&#039;s order, passed when the petitioners were absent from the hearing of the stay applications, was liable to be set aside. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh adjudication after granting both sides a proper opportunity to be heard on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:04:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 107 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47473</link>
      <description>An appellate order passed without affording the affected parties a reasonable opportunity of hearing cannot be sustained, as it suffers from procedural infirmity and violates fairness in adjudication. The Gujarat High Court held that the Tribunal&#039;s order, passed when the petitioners were absent from the hearing of the stay applications, was liable to be set aside. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh adjudication after granting both sides a proper opportunity to be heard on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>