https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780166 Bombay HC set aside the 8/9/2025 order blocking the petitioner's credit ledger account for failure to follow Rule 86-A and natural justice requirements, noting absence of adequate reasons and need for post-decisional hearing. The HC directed that the impugned order be vacated on condition the petitioner furnishes a bank guarantee from a nationalised bank for Rs. 6,50,00,000, and allowed the petitioner to avail the post-decisional hearing offered by respondent authorities; the petition was disposed accordingly. en-us Wed, 01 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Oct 2025 11:07:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780166 Bombay HC set aside the 8/9/2025 order blocking the petitioner's credit ledger account for failure to follow Rule 86-A and natural justice requirements, noting absence of adequate reasons and need for post-decisional hearing. The HC directed that the impugned order be vacated on condition the petitioner furnishes a bank guarantee from a nationalised bank for Rs. 6,50,00,000, and allowed the petitioner to avail the post-decisional hearing offered by respondent authorities; the petition was disposed accordingly. Case-Laws GST Wed, 01 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780166