<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1912 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464339</link>
    <description>ITAT DELHI - AT held that the AO erred in invoking Section 143(1)(a) to prima facie disallow delayed PF and ESI deposits; as the issue was debatable at the time of the intimation, the AO should have proceeded under Section 143(3). In consequence, the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of contributions under Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 2(24)(x) is set aside. The tribunal relied on subsequent SC authority and relevant HC treatment confirming the contested position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 10:36:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1912 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464339</link>
      <description>ITAT DELHI - AT held that the AO erred in invoking Section 143(1)(a) to prima facie disallow delayed PF and ESI deposits; as the issue was debatable at the time of the intimation, the AO should have proceeded under Section 143(3). In consequence, the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of contributions under Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 2(24)(x) is set aside. The tribunal relied on subsequent SC authority and relevant HC treatment confirming the contested position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>