<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 917 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780121</link>
    <description>Goods cleared to OEMs were analysed under Rule 1 and Rule 2(a) of the Rules for Interpretation, read with Section Notes 4 and 5 of Section XVI, to determine whether they were parts of colour television sets under heading 8529 or complete television sets under heading 8528. The Tribunal noted that there was no evidence of complete televisions being assembled, tested and then disassembled before clearance, and found that only fitting and simple assembly were undertaken at the OEM stage from predetermined kits. On those facts, the goods were treated as having the essential character of complete CTVs, so classification under heading 8528 applied, Rule 2(a) was inapplicable, and the duty demand and consequential penalties could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 16:57:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 917 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780121</link>
      <description>Goods cleared to OEMs were analysed under Rule 1 and Rule 2(a) of the Rules for Interpretation, read with Section Notes 4 and 5 of Section XVI, to determine whether they were parts of colour television sets under heading 8529 or complete television sets under heading 8528. The Tribunal noted that there was no evidence of complete televisions being assembled, tested and then disassembled before clearance, and found that only fitting and simple assembly were undertaken at the OEM stage from predetermined kits. On those facts, the goods were treated as having the essential character of complete CTVs, so classification under heading 8528 applied, Rule 2(a) was inapplicable, and the duty demand and consequential penalties could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>