<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 924 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780128</link>
    <description>CESTAT (New Delhi - AT) held that FOB value declared in shipping bills is the transaction value under s.14 Customs Act and cannot be re-determined by a stranger to the contract; reliance on lower ARE-1 values was unjustified where full export price per invoices was received. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order that rejected declared values, reduced drawback and imposed confiscation, fines and penalties under ss.114/114AA/125 Customs Act, and allowed the appeal, finding the FOB declarations must stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 11:56:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 924 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780128</link>
      <description>CESTAT (New Delhi - AT) held that FOB value declared in shipping bills is the transaction value under s.14 Customs Act and cannot be re-determined by a stranger to the contract; reliance on lower ARE-1 values was unjustified where full export price per invoices was received. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order that rejected declared values, reduced drawback and imposed confiscation, fines and penalties under ss.114/114AA/125 Customs Act, and allowed the appeal, finding the FOB declarations must stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>