<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 945 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780149</link>
    <description>ITAT JAIPUR held that a notice under section 148 issued after the three-year period required prior approval from the specified authority (PCCIT/PDG/CCIT/DGIT) under section 151(ii). The assessing officer failed to obtain such approval, rendering the notice bad in law. Relying on higher-court precedents, the Tribunal quashed the notice issued under section 148 and the consequential assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 09:18:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 945 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780149</link>
      <description>ITAT JAIPUR held that a notice under section 148 issued after the three-year period required prior approval from the specified authority (PCCIT/PDG/CCIT/DGIT) under section 151(ii). The assessing officer failed to obtain such approval, rendering the notice bad in law. Relying on higher-court precedents, the Tribunal quashed the notice issued under section 148 and the consequential assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>