<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 948 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780152</link>
    <description>ITAT MUMBAI - AT held that where a valid return is available and pending disposal by the AO, reopening under s.147/148 is impermissible because escapement of income cannot be presumed until the return is scrutinized or the scrutiny period has expired. Relying on MAD HC and SC precedents, the tribunal set aside the s.148 notice and quashed the consequent assessment order, allowing the taxpayer&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 09:18:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 948 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780152</link>
      <description>ITAT MUMBAI - AT held that where a valid return is available and pending disposal by the AO, reopening under s.147/148 is impermissible because escapement of income cannot be presumed until the return is scrutinized or the scrutiny period has expired. Relying on MAD HC and SC precedents, the tribunal set aside the s.148 notice and quashed the consequent assessment order, allowing the taxpayer&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>