https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780163 Review jurisdiction is confined to cases showing a patent error apparent on the face of the record, and unexplained delay can independently justify rejection of a review petition. The Supreme Court noted that the review petitions were filed with uncured defects and substantial delay that was not satisfactorily explained, and found no error apparent or other ground warranting reconsideration of the impugned order. The petitions were therefore held to be not maintainable and were rejected as lacking merit. en-us Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Oct 2025 09:18:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780163 Review jurisdiction is confined to cases showing a patent error apparent on the face of the record, and unexplained delay can independently justify rejection of a review petition. The Supreme Court noted that the review petitions were filed with uncured defects and substantial delay that was not satisfactorily explained, and found no error apparent or other ground warranting reconsideration of the impugned order. The petitions were therefore held to be not maintainable and were rejected as lacking merit. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780163