<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 71 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47452</link>
    <description>Valuation of processed fabrics under the Central Excise Act depends on the statutory scheme for normal wholesale price and the exception for transactions with related persons. The deemed factory-gate valuation formula in Ujagar Prints III is not conclusive where the processor and merchant-manufacturer are alleged to be related, because relationship must first be examined to determine whether an arm&#039;s-length basis exists. The unresolved questions of related-person status also govern any claim for discounts and deductions. The matter therefore required fresh adjudication on the parties&#039; relationship and the resulting assessable value before abatements could be considered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 71 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47452</link>
      <description>Valuation of processed fabrics under the Central Excise Act depends on the statutory scheme for normal wholesale price and the exception for transactions with related persons. The deemed factory-gate valuation formula in Ujagar Prints III is not conclusive where the processor and merchant-manufacturer are alleged to be related, because relationship must first be examined to determine whether an arm&#039;s-length basis exists. The unresolved questions of related-person status also govern any claim for discounts and deductions. The matter therefore required fresh adjudication on the parties&#039; relationship and the resulting assessable value before abatements could be considered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>