https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=59513 Petitioners challenged search-and-seizure and attendant proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, arguing absence of a prima facie case because a final report had been filed in relation to the underlying FIR and related corporate repayment directions were being followed; the High Court reviewed whether to invoke its inherent jurisdiction to quash investigative measures and, finding no adequate basis for interference, refused to displace the investigation while noting its observations would not affect trial proceedings. en-us Wed, 22 Oct 2025 21:16:02 +0530 Wed, 22 Oct 2025 21:16:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=59513 Petitioners challenged search-and-seizure and attendant proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, arguing absence of a prima facie case because a final report had been filed in relation to the underlying FIR and related corporate repayment directions were being followed; the High Court reviewed whether to invoke its inherent jurisdiction to quash investigative measures and, finding no adequate basis for interference, refused to displace the investigation while noting its observations would not affect trial proceedings. News - Wed, 22 Oct 2025 21:16:02 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=59513