https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47441 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that there was no manufacture of Tartaric Acid by the 1st respondent, emphasizing the process as involving only recovery of the acid. The court directed the Tribunal to reexamine the duty payment on sales by the 1st respondent, distinguishing between job work and sale transactions, and to consider the application of the extended period of limitation for duty collection under Section 11A. The matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for a thorough review of the legal contentions and aspects discussed in the judgment. en-us Thu, 06 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:44:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47441 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that there was no manufacture of Tartaric Acid by the 1st respondent, emphasizing the process as involving only recovery of the acid. The court directed the Tribunal to reexamine the duty payment on sales by the 1st respondent, distinguishing between job work and sale transactions, and to consider the application of the extended period of limitation for duty collection under Section 11A. The matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for a thorough review of the legal contentions and aspects discussed in the judgment. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47441