<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47437</link>
    <description>An exemption notification for speciality oils was construed strictly: only preparations made by blending or compounding mineral oil with other oils or substances fell within its terms. The notification&#039;s explanation and proviso limited the scope of the exemption, so products obtained merely by mixing mineral oils under Chapter 27 could not qualify. The interpretation that expanded the exemption and rendered limiting words redundant was rejected. Prior orders relating to different products did not control the present product. The assessee&#039;s claim failed, and the product was held not entitled to exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47437</link>
      <description>An exemption notification for speciality oils was construed strictly: only preparations made by blending or compounding mineral oil with other oils or substances fell within its terms. The notification&#039;s explanation and proviso limited the scope of the exemption, so products obtained merely by mixing mineral oils under Chapter 27 could not qualify. The interpretation that expanded the exemption and rendered limiting words redundant was rejected. Prior orders relating to different products did not control the present product. The assessee&#039;s claim failed, and the product was held not entitled to exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>