<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1828 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464327</link>
    <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned orders, holding that service tax cannot be levied on the markup collected over ocean freight. The Tribunal applied its earlier reasoning and noted the Supreme Court&#039;s affirmation that ocean freight per se is not taxable and consequently the markup on such freight is not liable to service tax. The demand raised for service tax on the freight markup was held unsustainable and is therefore annulled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2025 14:38:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1828 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464327</link>
      <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned orders, holding that service tax cannot be levied on the markup collected over ocean freight. The Tribunal applied its earlier reasoning and noted the Supreme Court&#039;s affirmation that ocean freight per se is not taxable and consequently the markup on such freight is not liable to service tax. The demand raised for service tax on the freight markup was held unsustainable and is therefore annulled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>