<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 124 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47431</link>
    <description>Cess collected on royalty and mineral rights tax for the period ending 4-4-1991 could not be retained once the later Supreme Court position on the legality of that levy was applied. The levy and recovery were therefore unsustainable for the relevant period, and the petitioner was entitled to refund of any amount already collected. Relief was limited to refund, with no basis for continued recovery by the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:22:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 124 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47431</link>
      <description>Cess collected on royalty and mineral rights tax for the period ending 4-4-1991 could not be retained once the later Supreme Court position on the legality of that levy was applied. The levy and recovery were therefore unsustainable for the relevant period, and the petitioner was entitled to refund of any amount already collected. Relief was limited to refund, with no basis for continued recovery by the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>