<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1707 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464331</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petitions challenging the restriction on filing before the Interim Board for Settlement instituted after the ITSC was abolished by the Finance Act, 2021. The Court upheld the limitation that only applications pending as of 01.02.2023 and those assessed as eligible on 31.01.2021 could be entertained, rejecting petitioners&#039; contention that their statutory remedy was retrospectively taken away. The petitions were dismissed following existing precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2025 14:38:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1707 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464331</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petitions challenging the restriction on filing before the Interim Board for Settlement instituted after the ITSC was abolished by the Finance Act, 2021. The Court upheld the limitation that only applications pending as of 01.02.2023 and those assessed as eligible on 31.01.2021 could be entertained, rejecting petitioners&#039; contention that their statutory remedy was retrospectively taken away. The petitions were dismissed following existing precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>