<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 117 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47427</link>
    <description>Interim stay of notifications granting exemption to pharmaceutical units in Himachal Pradesh and Uttaranchal, while levying duty on medicines manufactured by other units on MRP basis, was refused because the beneficiary units were not before the Court and there was no basis to restrain recovery of duty and taxes under the notifications. The Court held that an interim order should not block lawful tax collection; if the petitioners ultimately succeeded, consequential relief could be worked out later. The request to stay operation and implementation of the notifications was accordingly rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:11:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 117 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47427</link>
      <description>Interim stay of notifications granting exemption to pharmaceutical units in Himachal Pradesh and Uttaranchal, while levying duty on medicines manufactured by other units on MRP basis, was refused because the beneficiary units were not before the Court and there was no basis to restrain recovery of duty and taxes under the notifications. The Court held that an interim order should not block lawful tax collection; if the petitioners ultimately succeeded, consequential relief could be worked out later. The request to stay operation and implementation of the notifications was accordingly rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>