<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 89 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47425</link>
    <description>The SC held that a Tribunal cannot dispose of the main appeal while dealing only with a stay application; it must decide the appeal on its own merits. The Court also found that no clarification of the earlier judgment was required, because the judgment was clear in itself. As the Tribunal&#039;s order had combined disposal of the appeal with consideration of the stay request, that portion was set aside and the appeal was restored for fresh adjudication on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 89 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47425</link>
      <description>The SC held that a Tribunal cannot dispose of the main appeal while dealing only with a stay application; it must decide the appeal on its own merits. The Court also found that no clarification of the earlier judgment was required, because the judgment was clear in itself. As the Tribunal&#039;s order had combined disposal of the appeal with consideration of the stay request, that portion was set aside and the appeal was restored for fresh adjudication on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>