<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1534 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464321</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appellant&#039;s plea for a writ of mandamus directing respondent authorities to conduct a preliminary inquiry before registering any FIR for alleged official acts. The Court reiterated that where information prima facie discloses a cognizable offence, police must register an FIR and have no discretion to delay for a preliminary inquiry. Allegations of abuse of office and corrupt practices were held cognizable; complaints about ulterior motive can be tested during investigation or by remedies such as quashing under Section 482 CrPC, bail applications, or other legal challenges. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1534 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464321</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appellant&#039;s plea for a writ of mandamus directing respondent authorities to conduct a preliminary inquiry before registering any FIR for alleged official acts. The Court reiterated that where information prima facie discloses a cognizable offence, police must register an FIR and have no discretion to delay for a preliminary inquiry. Allegations of abuse of office and corrupt practices were held cognizable; complaints about ulterior motive can be tested during investigation or by remedies such as quashing under Section 482 CrPC, bail applications, or other legal challenges. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>