<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1911 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464325</link>
    <description>ITAT, Delhi (AT) upheld disallowance of delayed employee PF and ESI contributions under s.36(1)(va), aligning with SC precedent, noting the assessee conceded delay. The tribunal directed the AO to verify whether the delay should be calculated from the actual salary payment date (the point liability arose) and to decide accordingly. The AO must provide the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard before finalizing disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 16:41:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1911 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464325</link>
      <description>ITAT, Delhi (AT) upheld disallowance of delayed employee PF and ESI contributions under s.36(1)(va), aligning with SC precedent, noting the assessee conceded delay. The tribunal directed the AO to verify whether the delay should be calculated from the actual salary payment date (the point liability arose) and to decide accordingly. The AO must provide the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard before finalizing disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>