<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeals dismissed; provisional attachments under PMLA s.5(1) upheld, property can be attached as &quot;value thereof&quot;</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93468</link>
    <description>The AT dismissed the appeals; the provisional attachment orders under PMLA s.5(1) are upheld. The Tribunal held provisos to s.5(1) must be read with the main provision and permits attachment of property as &quot;value thereof&quot; even when the second proviso is invoked. Because money laundering requires proceeds of crime, a property acquired pre-offence may nonetheless remain attached where prima facie material suggests layering by a relative; however, final determination awaits the complete predicate investigation. The Directorate&#039;s restrained approach in securing a single property was endorsed. The appellants failed to produce corroborative evidence to rebut the attachments; consequently the appeals are dismissed and the properties remain secured pending further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 09:08:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 09:08:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeals dismissed; provisional attachments under PMLA s.5(1) upheld, property can be attached as &quot;value thereof&quot;</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93468</link>
      <description>The AT dismissed the appeals; the provisional attachment orders under PMLA s.5(1) are upheld. The Tribunal held provisos to s.5(1) must be read with the main provision and permits attachment of property as &quot;value thereof&quot; even when the second proviso is invoked. Because money laundering requires proceeds of crime, a property acquired pre-offence may nonetheless remain attached where prima facie material suggests layering by a relative; however, final determination awaits the complete predicate investigation. The Directorate&#039;s restrained approach in securing a single property was endorsed. The appellants failed to produce corroborative evidence to rebut the attachments; consequently the appeals are dismissed and the properties remain secured pending further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 09:08:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>