<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dispute remitted for fresh determination on service tax for renting immovable property; demand upheld for miscellaneous receipts and credit mismatches</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93462</link>
    <description>CESTAT remanded the dispute to the original adjudicating authority for fresh determination on the levy of service tax on renting of immovable property in light of the Supreme Court&#039;s decision, holding the issue unresolved for the affected tenants. The Tribunal upheld the confirmed demand relating to miscellaneous receipts, finding the appellant failed to substantiate that such receipts were non-taxable (e.g., scrap sales, interest) and sustained the demand with interest and penalty. The Tribunal also sustained the demand arising from discrepancies between the CENVAT Credit Register and ST-3 entries, finding absence of tax-paying documents to support claimed credit. Appeal partly allowed; matters remitted for recomputation and fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 09:08:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 09:08:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Dispute remitted for fresh determination on service tax for renting immovable property; demand upheld for miscellaneous receipts and credit mismatches</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93462</link>
      <description>CESTAT remanded the dispute to the original adjudicating authority for fresh determination on the levy of service tax on renting of immovable property in light of the Supreme Court&#039;s decision, holding the issue unresolved for the affected tenants. The Tribunal upheld the confirmed demand relating to miscellaneous receipts, finding the appellant failed to substantiate that such receipts were non-taxable (e.g., scrap sales, interest) and sustained the demand with interest and penalty. The Tribunal also sustained the demand arising from discrepancies between the CENVAT Credit Register and ST-3 entries, finding absence of tax-paying documents to support claimed credit. Appeal partly allowed; matters remitted for recomputation and fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 09:08:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>