<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 875 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780079</link>
    <description>CESTAT HYD - AT held that supplies made to an operator under projects awarded through International Competitive Bidding (ICB) under NELP qualify for exemption under the claimed notification. The tribunal found the appellant&#039;s documents and a reply from the licensing authority showing awards are made via ICB sufficient to prove entitlement; supplies made pursuant to the operator&#039;s purchase orders were for ICB-awarded projects and thus exempt. The department&#039;s contrary contention lacked evidential support, and since the impugned order failed on merits, limitation need not be considered. Appeal allowed; duty demand set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 09:08:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 875 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780079</link>
      <description>CESTAT HYD - AT held that supplies made to an operator under projects awarded through International Competitive Bidding (ICB) under NELP qualify for exemption under the claimed notification. The tribunal found the appellant&#039;s documents and a reply from the licensing authority showing awards are made via ICB sufficient to prove entitlement; supplies made pursuant to the operator&#039;s purchase orders were for ICB-awarded projects and thus exempt. The department&#039;s contrary contention lacked evidential support, and since the impugned order failed on merits, limitation need not be considered. Appeal allowed; duty demand set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>