<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 877 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780081</link>
    <description>HC held that pre-fabricated buildings, PUF panels, towers, channels and beams used for housing or supporting transmission equipment are &quot;goods&quot; and, being used in providing telecommunication services, qualify as &quot;inputs&quot; under CENVAT Rules. Following the Supreme Court precedent, the court ruled these items admissible for CENVAT credit, deciding the legal question in favour of the assessee and against the revenue, and allowed the appeals accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 09:08:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 877 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780081</link>
      <description>HC held that pre-fabricated buildings, PUF panels, towers, channels and beams used for housing or supporting transmission equipment are &quot;goods&quot; and, being used in providing telecommunication services, qualify as &quot;inputs&quot; under CENVAT Rules. Following the Supreme Court precedent, the court ruled these items admissible for CENVAT credit, deciding the legal question in favour of the assessee and against the revenue, and allowed the appeals accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>