<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 904 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780108</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the appeal, holding the assessee was not a defaulter under s.201(1)/201(1A). Payments to non-residents were accompanied by Form 15CB, tax was deducted/deposited as required, and withholding was applied in accordance with the Income Tax Act and relevant DTAA provisions. The Tribunal found AO and CIT(A) erred in disallowing expenses and treating the assessee as liable under s.201(1)/201(1A), and set aside those findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 09:08:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 904 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780108</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the appeal, holding the assessee was not a defaulter under s.201(1)/201(1A). Payments to non-residents were accompanied by Form 15CB, tax was deducted/deposited as required, and withholding was applied in accordance with the Income Tax Act and relevant DTAA provisions. The Tribunal found AO and CIT(A) erred in disallowing expenses and treating the assessee as liable under s.201(1)/201(1A), and set aside those findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>