<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 905 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780109</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing and treaty characterisation issues concerning a foreign film distributor&#039;s Indian arrangements were analysed under the India-US tax treaty and section 9(1)(vi). No further profit attribution was permitted where the India-related transaction had been accepted at arm&#039;s length and the alleged dependent agent permanent establishment was not shown to justify additional profits. Distribution receipts from cinematographic films were treated as outside the royalty charge because the statutory and treaty exclusions applied. Interest on income-tax refund was also computed under the treaty interest article at 15%, rather than the domestic rate, on the basis that the relevant income was not taxed as effectively connected with a permanent establishment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 12:52:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 905 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780109</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing and treaty characterisation issues concerning a foreign film distributor&#039;s Indian arrangements were analysed under the India-US tax treaty and section 9(1)(vi). No further profit attribution was permitted where the India-related transaction had been accepted at arm&#039;s length and the alleged dependent agent permanent establishment was not shown to justify additional profits. Distribution receipts from cinematographic films were treated as outside the royalty charge because the statutory and treaty exclusions applied. Interest on income-tax refund was also computed under the treaty interest article at 15%, rather than the domestic rate, on the basis that the relevant income was not taxed as effectively connected with a permanent establishment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>