https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47411 The Court upheld the classification of products under Tariff Heading 39.20.38 and 39.23.90, emphasizing the predominance of plastic content. The Appeal was dismissed due to the Appellants' failure to disclose relevant information and the Revenue's negligence. The Court criticized inconsistent Tribunal judgments and affirmed the correct classification under Chapter 39 for the products in question. en-us Mon, 26 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47411 The Court upheld the classification of products under Tariff Heading 39.20.38 and 39.23.90, emphasizing the predominance of plastic content. The Appeal was dismissed due to the Appellants' failure to disclose relevant information and the Revenue's negligence. The Court criticized inconsistent Tribunal judgments and affirmed the correct classification under Chapter 39 for the products in question. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 26 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47411