<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1534 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464310</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai (AT) held that the PCIT erred in setting aside the assessment under section 263. The tribunal found the AO had considered the explanations on discounts to members and non-members and completed the assessment; discounts given for business exigency to increase turnover were allowable as business decisions under section 36. Consequently the revision order directing reassessment was quashed and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 19:17:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1534 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464310</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai (AT) held that the PCIT erred in setting aside the assessment under section 263. The tribunal found the AO had considered the explanations on discounts to members and non-members and completed the assessment; discounts given for business exigency to increase turnover were allowable as business decisions under section 36. Consequently the revision order directing reassessment was quashed and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>