https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=59181 Petitioners argued that the 2022 memorandum of understanding for a foreign-supported digital identity project violated fundamental rights by avoiding parliamentary scrutiny and risking exposure of personal data to foreign entities; the Attorney General raised procedural preliminary objections, which the court accepted, preventing the petitions from proceeding to merits and leaving unadjudicated the substantive claims about parliamentary oversight and data-security risks. en-us Fri, 17 Oct 2025 17:31:03 +0530 Fri, 17 Oct 2025 17:31:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=59181 Petitioners argued that the 2022 memorandum of understanding for a foreign-supported digital identity project violated fundamental rights by avoiding parliamentary scrutiny and risking exposure of personal data to foreign entities; the Attorney General raised procedural preliminary objections, which the court accepted, preventing the petitions from proceeding to merits and leaving unadjudicated the substantive claims about parliamentary oversight and data-security risks. News - Fri, 17 Oct 2025 17:31:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=59181