https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47401 The Court quashed the order requiring a pre-deposit of demanded duty by the petitioner-Company, emphasizing the appellate authority's duty to consider the appellant's prima facie case and financial hardship. The Court found the impugned order lacking in application of mind and set it aside, granting the petitioner a fresh hearing on the stay application for demand recovery. The interim relief was to continue until the new decision by the appellate authority, with the petition allowed and no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:44:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47401 The Court quashed the order requiring a pre-deposit of demanded duty by the petitioner-Company, emphasizing the appellate authority's duty to consider the appellant's prima facie case and financial hardship. The Court found the impugned order lacking in application of mind and set it aside, granting the petitioner a fresh hearing on the stay application for demand recovery. The interim relief was to continue until the new decision by the appellate authority, with the petition allowed and no order as to costs. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47401